<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>Resolving Discovery Disputes - INSPECTION DEMANDS-What is a Diligent Search  - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com/</link>
      <description>California Discovery Referee &amp; Mediator</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:27:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:27:46 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>CM</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Good post today.  An issue I always come across--and have only found one reported decision discussing it (in Texas I think)--is whether an employee's work documents are in his/her possession custody and control if the employer is not part of the suit.  I am always of the position that they are property of the employer and not in the employee's control.  Any thoughts?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com/45-day-rule/compel-further-responses-1/inspection-demands-what-is-a-diligent-search/#99670</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com/45-day-rule/compel-further-responses-1/inspection-demands-what-is-a-diligent-search/#99670</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com/45-day-rule">Compel Further Responses</category><category domain="http://www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com/">Motions</category><category domain="http://www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com/">Request for Production of documents</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Katherine Gallo</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
